PFProjectsAboutContact
Currently open to product roles
Back to all projects

TripSync

One link to plan any group trip.

Travel TechConsumer0 to 1User ResearchVibe Coding
Landing
LANDING

The first screen a new member sees when the organizer shares the trip link — designed to communicate the value prop in one headline.

  • Names the exact problem: no more scattered WhatsApp chaos
  • Single CTA — no account needed just to see what's happening
  • Trip name and organizer visible upfront so it feels personal

TripSync was built after 16 user interviews revealed that group travel's real blocker isn't booking — it's getting people to commit, align on budget, and coordinate without burning out one person. I replaced the scattered stack of WhatsApp, Sheets, and Splitwise with a single link that handles everything from RSVP to settlement.

The Numbers
14/16 interviews
Confirmed organizer tax as the most universal pain point. One person absorbs all research, booking, budgeting, coordination, and blame — that's the problem I designed against.
12/16 interviews
Confirmed the commitment gap. Groups lose two-thirds of members between 'I'm interested' and 'I've committed.' Every organizer invented their own workaround because no product addressed this.
13/16 interviews
Confirmed expense tracking friction. Splitwise's free tier limits 3 transactions/day. I designed two modes — Quick Split and Group Fund — to match how different groups actually behave.
19 → 5 P0
Pain points identified from primary research, prioritized on severity × solvability. Five scored P0 Critical and form the product scope.

Why every group trip has one exhausted person

In 14 of 16 interviews, a single person handled everything: research, booking, budgeting, coordination, and conflict resolution. The organizer often had the worst trip experience because they were project-managing instead of relaxing. Existing tools don't distribute this burden — they concentrate it further by giving the organizer more to manage.

The commitment gap no tool was solving

Groups lose two-thirds of their members between 'I'm interested' and 'I've committed.' There's no formal mechanism to capture commitment. People say yes on WhatsApp, then go silent. Every organizer I interviewed invented their own workaround — non-refundable advances, Zoom calls, central funds. Three people, three solutions, one problem. Until commitment is locked, no downstream planning is reliable.

16 interviews, 19 pain points, 5 that matter

I conducted 16 interviews over 4 days across Pune, Bangalore, Mumbai, Delhi, Varanasi, and Boston. Ages 23–40, covering active organizers, passive travelers, execution-willing contributors, and family planners. I identified 19 pain points and prioritized them on two dimensions: severity and solvability. Five scored P0 Critical and form the minimum scope a product must address to be genuinely useful.

The 5-layer architecture

01. Commitment Layer

Organizer shares a link. Each member taps, signs in with Google, and RSVPs. Live status board shows who's confirmed, pending, or out. Auto-email reminders go to non-responders before the deadline.

02. Decision Alignment

Anonymous budget slider surfaces the group's overlap range. Structured polls replace chaotic WhatsApp threads. Every decision is logged with status: Proposed, Voting, Decided, Booked.

03. Work Distribution

Organizer assigns tasks to specific members with deadlines and status tracking. Email on assignment, reminder when overdue. The burden distributes instead of piling up.

04. Expense Tracking

Quick Split mode: add an expense in 4 taps, no daily limits. Group Fund mode: everyone contributes upfront, treasurer logs against the pool. Settlement summary shows optimized transfers.

05. Single Source of Truth

One link, always current: confirmed members, dates, plan, budget status, task checklist, expense balances. A member who missed 50 WhatsApp messages taps the link and knows everything in 30 seconds.